Click me!
Click me!
moneynetbusiness
linkbucks.com
Thursday, 3 November 2016
Who won the World Series? Don't ask Google Home
Eli Blumenthal
, USA TODAY
11:16 a.m. EDT November 3, 2016
USA TODAY'S Ed Baig compares Google Home to the Amazon Echo.
USA TODAY
1
CONNECT
TWEET
LINKEDIN
COMMENT
EMAIL
MORE
It was the question on everyone’s minds Wednesday night – particularly if you weren’t parked in front of a TV. Who won the World Series?
Reviews are pouring in for Google Home, the search giant's answer to the Amazon Echo smart speaker which goes on sale Friday. While there is a lot to like in the $129 device, many critics, including USA TODAY's own Ed Baig, noted that there's still plenty of room for improvement.
USA TODAY
Google Home review: In catch-up to Echo, but with promise
Both devices are good at handling a variety of tasks including playing music, controlling Philips Hue lights and calling for Uber rides. Google even has some other cool tricks including beaming videos onto your Chromecast. Interestingly though, it is in search where Amazon right now has an edge.
When I asked both devices this morning "who won the World Series?", Alexa gave me the correct answer ("the Chicago Cubs won the 2016 World Series four games to three") while Google started listing off recent scores from the past three games, directing me to ask for "a particular team" for more information.
Even Siri got the answer right, telling me the "Cubs won the World Series 4-3. They won the last game 8 to 7."
It wasn't just the final result that flummoxed Google's smart assistant.
As Ed noted in his review, when he asked Alexa and Google “what’s happening in the World Series?” when Game 7 between the Cubs and Indians entered extra innings Wednesday night, Alexa responded by starting an NPR flash briefing, while Google Home came back with the frustrating “I don’t know how to help with that yet.”
When he asked “What’s the score of the Cubs game?” Echo correctly informed him that it was 6-6 at the time, and Google Home instead gave the results from Game 6.
That said, we're still in the early days for smart digital assistants. But if you plan on getting one this holiday season, don't be surprised if not all your questions are answered.
Google Home review: In catch-up to Echo, but with promise
Google Home review: In catch-up to Echo, but with promise
Edward C. Baig , USA TODAY
11:11 a.m. EDT November 3, 2016
USA TODAY'S Ed Baig compares Google Home to the Amazon Echo.
USA TODAY
11
CONNECT
TWEET
4
LINKEDIN
2
COMMENT
EMAIL
MORE
Ask Google Assistant inside Google Home what it thinks of Amazon Echo's Alexa and you get a gracious reply: “I like Alexa’s blue lights. Her voice is nice too.”
(Alexa offers no opinion of the Google Assistant.)
Civility aside, the standalone $129 Home speaker that becomes available Friday is Google’s answer to the $179.99 Echo speaker, and a potentially strong answer at that, though Google is still in catchup mode and too often answered my voice queries with a “sorry I don’t know how to help with that yet.”
Echo was better at answering questions on who was expected to win the presidential election and who won the World Series and guessing a song you're looking for. Google Home had the edge with some features, like "tell me about my day."
Still, the competition between the two cloud-based, artificial intelligence-infused, voice-activated digital assistants is only likely to heat up—and promises to get even better.
Gartner recently projected that the global market for wireless speakers enabled by personal assistants will reach $2.1 billion by 2020, up from $360 million last year.
OK, Google
You summon the Google Assistant on Google Home, with a familiar “OK Google” verbal command, since the only physical button on Home mutes the microphone. Google Home stands roughly half as tall as the cylindrical-shaped Echo and you can change its aesthetic by replacing its base with one of a different color or texture. Indeed, Google Home is meant to be shown off in the home. It slopes down at the top, where you’ll find a capacitive touch surface and hidden LED lights that come alive when you issue a verbal command or Home is responding to your request. This is similar to the lights that ring the top of Echo.
You can slide your finger on this touch surface to change the volume on Home, but as with Echo it is much easier to do so via voice (e.g. “OK Google, set volume to 50%.”)
Home and Echo each exploit far-field voice recognition microphones, and way more times than not both recognized what I had to say, even with background noise and even if I was on the other side of the room.
Both speakers sound pretty swell too, though to my ear, I’d give the nod to Google Home.
Alexa has a head start:
I’ve been a huge fan of the Echo/Alexa tandem for some time. Amazon’s speaker has obviously had a big head start versus the Google Assistant’s own voice, which only recently debuted as a key feature inside the Google Pixel smartphone. (A non-verbal version of the Assistant launched prior to that inside the Google Allo messaging app.)
According to Amazon, tens of thousands of developers are building Alexa “skills” and there are more than 4,000 such skills already in place. Alexa has also expanded voice beyond the original Echo into spin-off products such Echo Dot and Amazon Tap, not to mention certain Fire Tablets and Fire TV devices.
For its part, Google doesn’t kick off its developer platform for the Google Assistant until next month, and you do wish it could do more right at launch.
Google Home still doesn’t handle some of the basics that Alexa can do, such as setting reminders or letting you add entries to your Google Calendar. It can let you know what is already on your Google Calendar.
Overlapping capabilities.
That said, both Alexa and Google Assistant are already capable of delivering on overlapping vocal stunts: among them, adjust a Nest thermostat, turn Philips Hue lights on or off, arrange a ride through Uber, convert euros to dollars, solve math problems, set timers, tell jokes, and deliver the news, sports and weather.
And of course they both play music or radio stations. Google Home can play music, radio or podcasts from Google Play Music, Spotify, YouTube Music, Pandora and TuneIn, and through accessory Chromecast devices and Cast-capable speakers, numerous other apps. It comes with a six-month subscription to YouTube Red.
If you have more than one Google Home unit you can take advantage of multi-room capabilities to hear the same song in different rooms.
Via voice, I was also to “cast” a video of
Uptown Funk
from YouTube videos onto a TV connected with Chromecast. That's pretty cool and not something Echo is capable of.
For its part, Echo can tap into Spotify, Pandora and TuneIn, as well as iHeartRadio and Amazon Music.
Where Google excels.
Google Home’s biggest advantage over Alexa comes with the rich reservoir of knowledge that defines Google itself. So Google Home can translate words and phrases into foreign languages—Alexa cannot do that right now. Within limits, Google is also ahead of Echo in conversational speech, the idea that you can ask follow up questions to your original request, without repeating every parameter of that request. I asked how the Google Assistant how far Neptune is from the Earth and got a detailed response from Space.com. I followed up by asking, “how about Saturn?” without having to repeat “from the Earth.”
Alexa could answer the first question but couldn’t handle the follow-up.
In another fun example, I asked the Assistant to “start instrument tuner.” It asked me which which musical note I wanted to hear. When I responded with “A,” “C,” “D” or whatever, Google Home played the scale for that note.
I like how you can ask the Assistant to “surprise me.” Upon doing so, Home rattles off random factoids (e.g., citing Wikipedia, the Assistant mentioned that “apple seeds contain a small amount of cyanide.”)
I also appreciate how Google Home responds to a “tell me about my day” query, with an immediate summary of the local weather and traffic, followed by a listing of upcoming calendar appointments, and then, the headlines from NPR, Fox News and other sources. I got hooked on this Google Assistant feature on the Pixel.
Unfortunately, for now, Google Home supports only a single Google account holder, meaning family members can’t ask about their own specific daily agenda. What’s more, you keep hearing how Google Assistant learns from you, but if all the members of your household start firing away requests, Google Home can’t distinguish one person from another.
Among the other growing pains I encountered during my tests: Google Home froze in the middle of a trivia game I was playing.
Where Echo prevails.
As I pointed out, Amazon is way ahead in the skills department. And Echo gave a more satisfying answer to the question “Who will win the presidential election?” No, it didn’t respond with Clinton or Trump. But it gave me results from the RealClear Politics polling average. Google said it couldn’t help with this yet.
And when I commanded Echo to “play that famous song from The Wizard of Oz” it began playing the soundtrack.” The same query on Google Home began with a Spotify playlist that was completely off the mark.
Echo also did better at helping me findi nearby sushi restaurants.
While Amazon Echo costs more than Google Home, Echo Dot is a comparative bargain at $49.99. Its speaker is ho-hum, though you can connect it via Bluetooth to better speakers, just as you can connect Amazon Home to better Chromecast-enabled speakers.
Room to grow.
The results you get with both assistants often still have to do with how you ask your question. When game 7 between the Cubs and Indians entered extra innings Wednesday night, I asked both assistants the identical question: “What’s happening in the World Series?” Alexa responded by starting an NPR flash briefing and Google Home came back with the frustrating “I don’t know how to help with that yet.” When I instead asked “What’s the score of the Cubs game?” Echo correctly informed me that it was 6-6 at the time. Google Home instead gave me the prior night’s result.
Suffice to say, there’s room for improvement. But having two of tech’s heavyweights push one another in the Home is ultimately good news for the consumer. Along the way hopefully the Google Assistant will remain civil to Alexa--and vice versa.
Amazon on Wednesday launched Amazon Music Unlimited, an on-demand, aggressively-priced streaming service powered by the Alexa voice familiar to Echo owners.
USA TODAY
Email:
ebaig@usatoday.com
; Follow USA TODAY Personal Tech Columnist
@edbaig
on Twitter
Hundreds of migrants die in two shipwrecks off Libya
Libya
Europe
migrants
Africa
Hundreds of migrants die in two shipwrecks off Libya
in
Share
0
print
© Andreas Solaro / AFP | Migrants crossing the Mediterranean on November 3, 2016.
Text by NEWS WIRES
Latest update : 2016-11-03
At least 239 migrants, believed to be from West Africa, have died in two shipwrecks off Libya, a spokesman for the United Nations migration agency, said on Thursday.
One group of migrants, including about 20 women and six children, set off in a rubber dinghy fromLibya around 3 am on Wednesday, but their boat collapsed after a few hours, said Flavio di Giacomo, a spokesman for the UN’s International Organisation for Migration, who cited accounts by survivors.
By the time rescuers arrived, most had drowned. Twelve bodies were recovered, including three babies. About 27 survived.
Another two women reported surviving a separate disaster that happened at about the same time. Their rubber dinghy was carrying about 140 people.
"A vessel with around 140 people on board overturned Wednesday just a few hours after setting off from Libya, throwing everyone into the water. Only 29 people survived," UNHCR spokesperson Carlotta Sami told AFP.
The International Organization for Migration said the latest deaths meant 4,220 lives had been lost in the Mediterranean so far this year, compared with 3,777 in the whole of 2015.
October saw a surge in migrant arrivals in Italy, with 27,388 arriving, more than the two previous Octobers combined, and bringing this year’s total arrivals to over 158,000, di Giacomo said.
The smugglers who arrange the journeys have told migrants that European training of Libyan coastguards means the rescue missions will soon be handed over to Libya and any rescued migrants will be taken ashore in Libya rather than Italy, di Giacomo said.
That was possibly causing the rush to board boats now, he said, although the information, gleaned from rescued migrants, was not confirmed.
Newer Posts
Older Posts
Home
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)